BYOD is Bombing

I hear it on a regular basis, “Our school district goal is to be at a one-to-one ratio of students to computing devices and part of our plan is to have students BYOD (bring your own device) from home.” I have yet to hear from anyone that the approach worked out as they expected. In fact, I have only heard about the messes that the policy has created. If your school district leadership is thinking this way, perhaps some of the thoughts herein will help to frame the discussion.

First of all, there is absolutely no verifiable data regarding how many homes have a laptop computer that a student could bring to school. Every single study out there does not differentiate between desktop, laptop computer, or tablet—big difference regarding portability and usability. Even worse, many studies consider a “smartphone” a computer.

I understand the point, but reading a 300-word story and then writing a 50-word synopsis in your own words on a smartphone or tablet is simply not effective. Yes, I am a digital immigrant and suffer from a medical condition called FSFHS (fat stubby fingers and hands syndrome), but really! 50 words on a smartphone? By the way, that exercise is part of the fifth-grade reading comprehension test in every state.

As a second point, if your house is like mine, the kids get the “long-in-the tooth” laptop that dad or mom no longer want. In fact, most of those hand-me-downs have so many idiosyncrasies that mom or dad are simply tired of futzing with the silly thing and give it to the kids. So even if there is a laptop available from home, it will be of questionable functionality. It will also have a fairly old version of the operating and web browser system, full of all the old known security holes.

Yes, there are a few upper grade students who will have some of the latest whiz bang devices but they are actually a miniscule percentage of the overall student population. The reality is that you will have a very small percentage of your high school grade students using the BYOD policy.

Your leadership says, “We’re going to be progressive and move forward anyway.” Now the real trouble, with a capital T, comes to school. No one has the foggiest idea of where that BYOD device went last night; what it touched, what touched it, and what hitched a ride on the device. Unfortunately, this is where most districts drop the ball. Now we have BYOD devices on our network delivering malware to other devices on our network.

Historically, IT only needed to protect the kingdom from hurtful things trying to get into the castle through the main gate (router/firewall). Now the hurtful things are in the castle and on the “safe and secure” side of the router/firewall. There is a very large community of users out there who have been addressing this problem since 1995, called higher education. They operate in a strictly BYOD environment and have done so with quite a bit of success for a long time. They and the vendors they use have developed essentially two different paths to success.

The older path is that they require minimum computing device hardware requirements. If the device meets or exceeds those minimums, the student must log-in and download the anti-virus/malware application the educational organization has standardized on. The fee for that application is buried somewhere in their “student services” fee. The student is also required to keep the application up to date. If the student fails to stay current, their device will simply be denied access to the network.

A newer model is now available with increased computing power and more powerful algorithms. You purchase one of the “Next Generation” firewalls which also monitors your front gate and the secure side of the network for unusual traffic or computing device behavior. Those units are not inexpensive and they come with a hefty subscription cost for constant updates.

Unfortunately, none of those districts who ended up with messes followed either of these paths. So, if your leadership insists on implementing a BYOD policy. Make sure they pony up for the additional expenses. FYI—if you are moving to a “Web Browser” environment (think Chromebook) only the next generation firewall solution will work for your environment. Also, don’t let anyone tell you that you do not need that level of protection with Chromebooks or similar devices.

This article originally appeared in the School Planning & Management June 2018 issue of Spaces4Learning.

About the Author

Glenn Meeks is president of Meeks Educational Technology located in Cary, N.C. He can be reached at gmeeks@meeksgeeks.com.

Featured

  • Springfield Breaks Ground on $53.7M Pipkin Middle School Rebuild

    Construction is underway on a new, state-of-the-art Pipkin Middle School in Springfield, Mo., a major step in Springfield Public Schools’ (SPS) long-term facility improvement plan, according to local news. The $53.7-million project officially broke ground in early June, following years of planning and community input aimed at modernizing aging infrastructure and addressing student capacity concerns.

  • Key Considerations for Office-to-Higher-Education Facility Conversions

    Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, office-to-alternative-use conversions have become a recurring subject of urban development discourse. Office utilization rates across major U.S. cities remain below 50%, with vacancy rates exceeding 27% in San Francisco and 16% in New York. Higher education facilities present programmatic and spatial use cases that align readily with the typical characteristics of commercial office buildings.

  • i-PRO, NovoTrax Partner for New School Emergency Response Solution

    i-PRO Americas, Inc., which manufactures edge computing cameras, recently announced a partnership with NovoTrax, provider of end-to-end life safety and mass notification solutions, to address gaps in emergency response workflows at K–12 schools, according to a news release.

  • K–12 Safety Trends Report Reveals Reliance on Training, Technology

    Wearable safety technology provider CENTEGIX recently released its 2025 School Safety Trends Report, according to a news release. The report is based on more than 265,000 incidents during the 2024–25 school year as reported through the CENTEGIX Safety Platform, used by more than 800 school districts across the U.S.

Digital Edition